|
Reaching Agreement Through Technical Analysis
IT'S
YOUR CHOICE. You can spend a small fortune entrusting your
owner/builder/architect/engineer argument to the traditional system of
lawyers and juries, high costs and uncertain outcomes:
or you
can go to professional arbitration, with no appeal, usually run by a
retired judge with no construction knowledge and a main focus on
insurance coverage:
OR, you can rely on a flexible mediation
process based on professional technical analysis focused on your
construction problem, using standard-of-the-industry engineering and
contracting criteria to analyze and evaluate claims and defenses,
apportion remedies and costs, and allocate responsibilities, in a forum
where no finding is forced on anyone.
MEDIATION IS COST EFFECTIVE:
You'll spend a fraction of the price of entry to the traditional legal system.
MEDIATION IS EFFICIENT:
It's based on factual analysis, not legal maneuvers and emotion.
MEDIATION IS PREDICTABLE:
Answers come from technical analysis, not a theatrical court process.
MEDIATION IS VOLUNTARY:
It's a non-binding pursuit of truth. You can quit whenever you wish.
MEDIATION IS CONFIDENTIAL:
The legal system isn't.
MEDIATION IS BETTER:
Unless, for some reason, you prefer spending more money and time for an unpredictable outcome.
For a no obligation conference on your problem contact us.
IN THE PRACTICE OF ARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING SINCE 1964
Martin S. Harris Jr. /RA
Benjamin Richards /PE
|
|
